The problem
Most organisations know their data is underused. Few know where to start.
Tools have piled up project after project. Practices differ from one team to the next. What is documented no longer matches what is done. Nobody holds the full picture, and every new initiative starts from a blank page. And findings without arbitration change nothing: with no explicit decision, transformation dissolves into parallel projects competing for the same teams and the same budget.
How it runs
Typical duration:five days
- 1
Framing
Interviews with leadership and the business teams. What you are trying to achieve, and why now.
- 2
Survey
An inventory of tools, flows and actual practices — the documented ones and the undocumented ones alike.
- 3
Assessment
Digital and data maturity measured against a reference framework, domain by domain.
- 4
Scenarios
Two or three possible paths, costed, with their dependencies and what each costs in team time — not only in budget.
- 5
Arbitration
A decision at executive level. What starts, what waits, what is given up — the last point being the one most often skipped.
- 6
Roadmap
Sequencing, milestones, ownership and success criteria, presented to the executive committee. A document your teams can execute without us.
Deliverables
- Map of data flows and tools
- Digital and data maturity grid
- Costed transformation scenarios
- Prioritised, sequenced roadmap with milestones
- Responsibility matrix and success criteria
- Executive committee readout
« We knew our data was an asset. We did not know which data, or where it was. »
Ready to structure your projects differently?
See how Constellab can simplify your projects, strengthen traceability and unlock the full potential of your scientific data.